Team Obama fired General Motors' Chief Executive
Officer Rick Wagoner on Sunday afternoon, just a short time after Treasury
Secretary Timothy F. Geithner told the television talk shows that some banks
will need large amounts of new government assistance - even though the
bankers don't want it. Does this smack of big-time government planning and
industrial policy? Another lurch to the left for economic policy?
Remember, as bad as Mr. Wagoner's performance has been over the years, it
was the federal government - not shareholders or the board of directors -
that threw him under the bus. (By the way, GM's board is being thrown under
that same bus.) I'm not arguing in favor of Mr. Wagoner or his board -
they've made a zillion mistakes - but I am wondering if we've officially
entered a new era of government-controlled business.
Sen. Bob Corker, Tennessee Republican, probably the most knowledgeable
man in Congress about the car bailout and someone who argued months ago in
favor of a preplanned government-sponsored bankruptcy for GM and Chrysler,
calls the Wagoner firing “a major power grab by the White House on the heels
of another power grab from Secretary Geithner, who asked last week for the
freedom to decide on his own which companies are 'systemically' important to
our country and worthy of taxpayer investment, and which are not.” Mr.
Corker calls this “a marked departure from the past,” “truly breathtaking”
and something that “should send a chill through all Americans who believe in
free enterprise.”
Mr. Corker has hit the nail on the head. I think the “truly breathtaking”
government departure from American free enterprise that he described -
whether it's the banks or the bankrupt Detroit carmakers - is exactly what
caused stocks to plunge 250 points Monday.
Incidentally, most of the big bankers who met with President Obama in the
White House on Friday want to pay back their money from the Troubled Asset
Relief Program, not take more of it. However, the Treasury is conducting
stress tests that could stop the TARP pay-downs and force banks to accept
more taxpayer funds and even more federal control.
The big bankers say they are profitable. And with an upward-sloping
Treasury yield curve and some market-to-market accounting reform coming from
the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB), the outlook for banks
should be getting better, not worse. So why is the Treasury jamming more
TARP money down bankers' throats, especially after announcing a new plan to
use private capital to clean up bank balance sheets and solve the
toxic-assets problem? It sounds as if the Treasury doesn't want to let go of
its new uber-regulator status.
As for Detroit, the carmakers should have been in bankruptcy months ago.
It is a bankruptcy court that should have fired GM's Mr. Wagoner and his
board. Along with some serious pain for bondholders, bankruptcy would have
broken the high-cost labor contracts with the United Auto Workers as well as
carmaker contracts with dealers across the country. That's what bankruptcy
courts are for. They're part of the free-market capitalist system.
Former Securities and Exchange Commission Chairman Richard C. Breeden
argues against a systemic uber-regulator for banks and in favor of special
financial bankruptcy courts. Again, the story is court-ordered
restructuring, not government control by political bureaucrats who like
their power so much they want to keep running the various companies in
question.
And why isn't Mr. Obama's special auto task force ordering a replacement
for Ron Gettelfinger, the UAW president? Weren't the union's oversized pay
and benefit packages a big part of the problem? Well, that will never
happen. The election power of the union is too strong. But this does reveal
the political nature of the government bailout operations.
Incidentally, in Mr. Obama's speech on Monday about Mr. Wagoner's firing
as well as in Treasury term sheets for GM and Chrysler, there were multiple
references to “the next generation of clean cars,” to new CAFE (Corporate
Average Fuel Economy)-standard mileage increases and to green power-train
developments. All this is a big green climate-change priority for the new
administration.
But the simple fact is that small, tinny and expensive green cars just
don't work for consumers. And even if those cars are designed better, the
cost structure of the carmakers will have to be brought down so far that UAW
wages will be forced below those of the nonunion shops in Detroit south
(including Honda, Toyota and other foreign carmakers now producing in the
United States).
So add the green revolution to the industrial-policy plans of the White
House. Expect a big increase in CAFE fuel standards, even though small cars
simply are not profitable. And plan on bailout nation taking a new left turn
toward the kind of central planning that has held down economic growth in
Europe and Japan for so very long.
Lawrence Kudlow is host of CNBC's “Kudlow & Company” and is a nationally
syndicated columnist. |