Courtroom Cirque du Jihad
by Michelle Malkin
MichelleMalkin.com
Creators Syndicate
Imagine this nightmare courtroom scenario: Unhinged Jew-bashing, open mockery
of American soldiers, juror intimidation, and coldly calculated exploitation of
U.S. constitutional protections by a suspected al Qaeda defendant. Well, there’s
no need to wait for the Gitmo terror trial circuses. New York City is already
getting a glimpse of the future.
Jihadi scientist Aafia Siddiqui is on trial right now in a federal Manhattan
court for the attempted murder and assault of U.S. military personnel in
Pakistan two years ago. She’s an accomplished Karachi-born scientist who studied
microbiology at MIT and did graduate work in neurology at Brandeis University
before disappearing in the wake of the 9/11 attacks.
Counterterrorism investigators connected Siddiqui and her estranged husband,
anesthesiologist Dr. Mohammed Amjad Khan, to Saudi terror funders. The couple’s
bank account showed repeated purchases of high-tech military equipment and
apparel, including body armor, night-vision goggles, and military manuals. Her
second husband, fellow al Qaeda suspect and 9/11 plot helper Ammar al Baluchi,
is one of five Gitmo detainees that the Obama administration is planning to
transfer to New York for trial.
Siddiqui was identified as an al Qaeda operative, financier, and fixer by no
less than 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed during U.S. interrogations. Al
Baluchi is KSM’s nephew. Mohammed reportedly enlisted Siddiqui in a
Baltimore-based plot to bomb gas stations, fuel tanks, and bridges, and poison
water reservoirs in the greater Washington, D.C. area.. Siddiqui was taken into
custody in Kabul in July 2008 after attempting to shoot U.S. military
interrogators and FBI agents.
Now, the savvy “Terror Mom” of three is pulling out all the stops to win a
mistrial. Among her Cirque du Jihad antics:
*Demanding that jurors be genetically tested for a “Zionist or Israeli
background” to ensure a fair and impartial jury of her Jew-hating peers;
*Ranting about 9/11/Israel conspiracies during voir dire;
*Screaming out loud during the testimony of U.S. Army Capt. Robert Snyder,
who was in the room in Kabul when Siddiqui allegedly grabbed an M-4 rifle and
proclaimed, “Allah Akbar!” and “I hate Americans! Death to America!” Before
being ejected from the courtroom, Siddiqui shouted to Snyder, “You’re lying!”
She also babbled about torture at a secret prison;
*And blurting out “I feel sorry for you” to the witness in front of the jury
before being led out of the courtroom again.
Siddiqui’s defense team, funded in part by the Pakistani government, asserts
that Lady Al Qaeda is so mentally ga-ga that she should not be allowed to take
the witness stand. Bleeding-heart human rights groups have dutifully rallied
around Siddiqui. She’s Mumia abu Jamal in a burqa. Indeed, her supporters have
launched their own “Free Affia” campaign. But two government-retained
psychiatrists, working independently, determined last year that Siddiqui’s
so-called symptoms of mental illness were attributed to “malingering” and
“manipulation.” The judge in the case concluded that she is competent and
understands full well the charges against her.
The Crazy Jihadi tactic is in perfect sync with the al Qaeda training manual
advising its operatives to claim victimhood status if arrested and put on trial.
This act is also in keeping with a long tradition of terror defendants invoking
the insanity card – from “20th hijacker” Zacarias Moussaoui (whose lawyers
chalked up his mass-murdering ambitions to a traumatic childhood) to Fort Hood
massacre Nidal Hasan (whose defense will undoubtedly play up his lonely
bachelorhood).
To make matters worse, the New York Post reported this week that an
“unidentified man in a white headdress” mouthed an obscenity at the Siddiqu
trial and cocked his finger like a gun at two jurors. The jurors were let go; it
remains unclear whether the thug in white headdress will be charged and what
relation, if any, he has to Siddiqui.
Would you answer a jury summons knowing you could end up sitting in front of
a jihadi sympathizer on the loose mentally painting a target on your forehead?
And would you trust the White House ringmasters and Justice Department
terror-coddlers to protect you from harm?
These suspects belong in controlled military tribunals, not federal
courtrooms that are being turned into al Qaeda p.r. platforms. The O.J. Simpson
spectacle of a smirking murder suspect, preening defense attorneys, a
showboating judge, and the judicial process run amok on cable TV 24/7 was bad
enough. The 1993 World Trade Center bombing trial, which gave the bin Laden
network a multi-million-dollar, tax-subsidized legal team, free translation
services, personal dry-cleaning services, race-baiting defense witnesses, and
access to information that was allegedly used by jihadists to evade
surveillance, was even worse.
The specter of 10 or 15 or 20 Siddiqui-style courtroom carnivals – at a cost
of at least $1 billion to taxpayers – threatens to throw our civilian courtroom
system into complete chaos. America can’t afford to clown around with national
security.
Home | Articles | BLOG | Quotes | Photo Gallery | Favorites | Stupid Frogs Game | Store | Feedback | Search | Subscribe | About Us
|