It's bad enough when illiterate jurors issue
damages awards in the billions of dollars because they don't grasp the
difference between a million and a billion. Now it turns out the
Democrats don't know the difference between a million and a trillion.
Why not make the "stimulus bill" a kazillion dollars?
All Americans who
work for a living, or who
plan to work for a living sometime in the next century, are about to be
stuck with a trillion-dollar bill to fund yet more oppressive government
bureaucracies. Or as I call it, a trillion dollars and change.
The stimulus bill isn't as bad as we had expected – it's much worse.
Instead of merely creating useless, make-work jobs digging ditches – or
"shovel-ready," in the Democrats' felicitous phrase – the "stimulus"
bill will create an endless army of government bureaucrats aggressively
intervening in our lives. Instead of digging ditches, American taxpayers
will be digging our own graves.
There are hundreds of examples in the 800-page "stimulus" bill, but
here are just two.
First, the welfare bureaucrats are coming back.
For half a century, the welfare establishment had the bright idea to
pay women to have children out of wedlock. Following the iron laws of
economics – subsidize something, you get more of it; tax it, you get
less of it – the number of children being born out of wedlock
skyrocketed.
The 1996 Welfare Reform bill marked the first time any government
entitlement had ever been rolled back. Despite liberal howling and
foot-stomping, not subsidizing illegitimacy led, like night into day, to
less illegitimacy.
Welfare recipients got jobs, as the hard-core unemployables were
coaxed away from their
TV
sets and into the workforce.
For the first time in decades, the ever-increasing illegitimacy rate
stopped spiraling upward.
As proof that that welfare reform was a smashing success, a few years
later, Bill Clinton started claiming full credit for the bill.
Well, that's over. The stimulus bill goes a long way toward repealing
the work requirement of the 1996 Republican Welfare Reform bill and
rewards states that increase their welfare caseloads by paying unwed
mothers to sit home doing nothing.
Second, bureaucrats at Health and
Human
Services will electronically
collect every citizen's complete
medical
records and determine
appropriate medical care.
Judging by the care the State Department took with private visa
records last year, that the Ohio government took with Joe the Plumber's
government records, that the Pentagon took with Linda Tripp's employment
records in 1998, and that the FBI took with thousands of top secret
"raw" background files in President Clinton's first term, the bright
side is: We'll finally be able to find out if Bill Clinton has syphilis
– all thanks to the stimulus bill!
HHS bureaucrats will soon be empowered to overrule your doctor.
Doctors who don't comply with the government's treatment protocols will
be fined. That's right: Instead of your treatment being determined by
your doctor, it will be settled on by some narcoleptic half-wit in
Washington who couldn't
get
a
job in the private sector.
And a brand-new set of bureaucrats in the newly created office of
"National Coordinator of Health
Information
Technology" will be empowered
to cut off treatments that merely prolong life. Sorry, Mom and Pop, Big
Brother said it's time to go.
At every other workplace in the nation – even Wal-Mart! – workers are
being laid off. But no one at any of the bloated government
bureaucracies ever need fear receiving a pink
slip. All 64,750
employees at the department
of Health and Human Services are apparently absolutely crucial to the
smooth functioning of the department.
With the stimulus bill, liberals plan to move unfirable government
workers into every activity in America, where they will superintend all
aspects of our lives.
Also, thanks to the stimulus bill, the private sector will gradually
shrivel and die. According to the Congressional Budget Office, the cost
of servicing the bill's nearly trillion-dollar debt will shrink the
economy within a decade.
Robert Kennedy famously said: "There are those who look at things the
way they are and ask, 'Why?' I dream of things that never were and ask,
'Why not?'"
The new liberal version is: There are those who look at things
and ask, "Why on earth should the government be paying for that?" I
dream of things that never were funded by the government and ask, "Why
not?"