HARDEST HIT BY OBAMACARE
By DICK MORRIS & EILEEN MCGANN
NYPost.com
The "health-care reform" bills in Congress would hit 39 states hard with new
expenses, by raising Medicaid eligibility above the cur rent income cutoffs.
The only states that won't have to raise eligibility because of the Senate bill
are Connecticut, Illinois, Maine, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Jersey, New
York, Rhode Island, Tennessee, Vermont and Wisconsin (plus the District of
Columbia). And the House bill would force even Massachusetts and Vermont to pay
more.
Hardest hit would be Texas ($2,750 million a year in extra state spending under
the Senate bill), Pennsylvania ($1,450 million), California ($1,428 million) and
Florida ($909 million). Who knows if Florida could avoid imposing an income tax
if it has to meet so high an unfunded mandate?
The required increases in state spending are likely to be quite high in some
states whose senators are swing votes on ObamaCare:
* In Arkansas, home to swing Sens. Mark Pryor and Blanche Lincoln, the annual
increased state spending would come to $402 million (not counting the federal
share) -- about a 10 percent increase in the state budget, which is now $4
billion a year.
* In Louisiana, whose Sen. Marie Landrieu sold her vote on a key procedural
motion in return for more Medicaid funding, the increase would come to $432
million (a 5 percent hike in state spending) -- more than wiping out the extra
funds she got in return for her vote.
* In Sen. Evan Bayh's Indiana, spending would go up by $586 million a year, a
rise of 4 percent.
* In Sen. Ben Nelson's Nebraska, the added state spending would be $81 million a
year, a 2 percent increase.
The Sebate ObamaCare bill would cost North Dakota, home of Sens. Kent Conrad and
Byron Dorgan, $14 million. South Dakota, represented by Sen. Tim Johnson, would
have to boost Medicaid spending by $33 million.
The Medicaid-expansion provisions of the Senate bill are complex. In the first
year of the program (2013), states must enroll anyone who earns less than 133
percent of the poverty level in their programs. For a family of four, the
national average poverty level in 2009 is $22,000 a year. So any family that
size that makes less than $29,000 would be eligible for Medicaid.
Many states, particularly in the South, actually have Medicaid cutoffs below the
poverty level. Arkansas, for example, cuts off its Medicaid eligibility at only
17 percent of poverty level, and in Louisiana it goes up to only 26 percent. For
these states, the spending increase required by the new bill is huge.
For the first three years of the program (2013-15) the federal government would
pay for all of the costs of the Medicaid expansion. But, starting in the fourth
year of operation -- 2016 -- the average state would be obliged to pay 10
percent of the extra cost.
For Democratic governors, this provision means sudden death. Particularly in
states with limited Medicaid coverage, it would require huge tax increases.
Home | Articles | BLOG | Quotes | Photo Gallery | Favorites | Stupid Frogs Game | Store | Feedback | Search | Subscribe | About Us
|