Obama: His reform drive has led to bills that hurt everyone who has
insurance now.
PRESIDENT Obama promises that "if you like your
health plan, you can keep it," even after he reforms our health-care system.
That's untrue. The bills now before Congress would force you to switch to a
managed-care plan with limits on your access to specialists and tests.
Two main bills are being rushed through Congress with
the goal of combining them into a finished product by August. Under either, a
new government bureaucracy will select health plans that it considers in your
best interest, and you will have to enroll in one of these "qualified plans." If
you now get your plan through work, your employer has a five-year "grace period"
to switch you into a qualified plan. If you buy your own insurance, you'll have
less time.
And as soon as anything changes in your contract --
such as a change in copays or deductibles, which many insurers change every year
-- you'll have to move into a qualified plan instead (House bill, p. 16-17).
When you file your taxes, if you can't prove to the
IRS that you are in a qualified plan, you'll be fined thousands of dollars -- as
much as the average cost of a health plan for your family size -- and then
automatically enrolled in a randomly selected plan (House bill, p. 167-168).
It's one thing to require that people getting
government assistance tolerate managed care, but the legislation limits you to a
managed-care plan even if you and your employer are footing the bill (Senate
bill, p. 57-58). The goal is to reduce everyone's consumption of health care and
to ensure that people have the same health-care experience, regardless of
ability to pay.
Nowhere does the legislation say how much health
plans will cost, but a family of four is eligible for some government assistance
until their household income reaches $88,000 (House bill, p. 137). If you earn
more than that, you'll have to pay the cost no matter how high it goes.
The price tag for this legislation is a whopping
$1.04 trillion to $1.6 trillion (Congressional Budget Office estimates). Half of
the tab comes from tax increases on individuals earning $280,000 or more, and
these new taxes will double in 2012 unless savings exceed predicted costs (House
bill, p. 199). The rest of the cost is paid for by cutting seniors' health
benefits under Medicare.
There's plenty of waste in Medicare, but the
Congressional Budget Office estimates only 1 percent of the savings under the
legislation will be from curbing waste, fraud and abuse. That means the rest
will likely come from reducing what patients get.
One troubling provision of the House bill compels
seniors to submit to a counseling session every five years (and more often if
they become sick or go into a nursing home) about alternatives for end-of-life
care (House bill, p. 425-430). The sessions cover highly sensitive matters such
as whether to receive antibiotics and "the use of artificially administered
nutrition and hydration."
This mandate invites abuse, and seniors could easily
be pushed to refuse care. Do we really want government involved in such deeply
personal issues?
Shockingly, only a portion of the money accumulated
from slashing senior benefits and raising taxes goes to pay for covering the
uninsured. The Senate bill allocates huge sums to "community transformation
grants," home visits for expectant families, services for migrant workers -- and
the creation of dozens of new government councils, programs and advisory boards
slipped into the last 500 pages.
The most recent ABC News/Washington Post poll (June
21) finds that 83 percent of Americans are very satisfied or somewhat satisfied
with the quality of their health care, and 81 percent are similarly satisfied
with their health insurance.
They have good reason to be. If you're diagnosed
with cancer, you have a better chance of surviving it in the United States than
anywhere else, according to the Concord Five Continent Study. And the World
Health Organization ranked the United States No. 1 out of 191 countries for
being responsive to patients' needs, including providing timely treatments and a
choice of doctors.
Congress should pursue less radical ways to cover
the uninsured. We have too much to lose with this legislation.
Betsy McCaughey is founder of the Committee to
Reduce Infection Deaths and a former lieutenant governor of New York. betsy@hospitalinfection.org