Progressives Just Made the Best Argument Possible for Voting Trump
  In God We Trust

Progessives Just Made the Best Argument for Voting Trump


By Tim Dunkin

Progressives and others on the radical Left are not very intelligent people.  This is something we should be very thankful for, because were they actually competent, they would have completely overwhelmed the spineless, feckless Republican Party and established total control decades ago.  As it stands, because progressives in the United States have so little foresight and self-control, they end up damaging their own cause through their own foolish behavior and inability to moderate themselves for the sake of more broadly appealing to the masses. 

This was shown most recently in Albuquerque, New Mexico, where a crowd of left-wing hooligans—including a large contingent of Mexican flag-waving illegal immigrants—attempted to shut down a Trump rally in the city.  They failed, of course, as people on the Left nearly always do, but not before they demonstrated to the rest of the country why we desperately need President Trump to clamp down on people like them.  In the course of the riot (not “protest”), they burned American flags, fired pellet guns at people, threw rocks and bottles, attacked a man in a wheelchair, destroyed police vehicles, and even critically injured a police horse.  To date, the Left has not condemned, or even apologized for, the violence committed by these thugs.  By all appearances, the Left seems to approve of the attempt to use violence to stifle free political expression and to coerce its opponents into silence.

Bulk of the mayhem is being committed by illegal aliens

Most Americans revolt against the idea that our politics will be, or even could be, dominated by whoever can cause the most mayhem in the streets.  This is why these sorts of riots only serve to generate sympathy, and then support, for Donald Trump.  The more Americans see what the opposition really has to offer, the more they reject it.  This is especially the case when the bulk of the mayhem is being committed by illegal aliens—people who, by definition, are not even supposed to be here and who are, again by definition, already systematically violating our nation’s laws and sovereignty.

Like the rest of the Anglosphere, the United States has a long tradition of the orderly transition of executive power.  We hold our elections in an orderly process, and we respect the results of those elections.  We don’t riot in the streets to overturn or to influence them.  This is a tradition drawn from our Anglo-Saxon heritage that dates back for centuries and was operating even when other Western and European nations were still having trouble figuring out the concept.

So what to make of a bunch of hostile, law-breaking foreigners who are now attempting to use violence and coercion to intimidate voters and to sway the election in their direction?

The take home message is that they are showing us all exactly why they should not be here to begin with.

The radical Left already has little enough respect for our republican electoral process

The radical Left already has little enough respect for our republican electoral process.  Illegal aliens from Latin America have even less respect for it.  They come from countries whose political systems are largely made up of alternating ideological revolutions interspersed with intermittent periods of extremely corrupt “democracies” which inevitable fail because they have no cultural traditions of political stability or power-sharing.  When the illegal aliens riot and use violence for political ends, they’re merely following the political traditions of the countries they came from.

But the thing is, we don’t want those political traditions here.  If the choice is between Anglo-American political tolerance and Latin American political coercion, then the superior preference is obvious.  And the next step in the argument must be that since these illegals are bringing in undesirable corruption and subversion of our electoral process (as well as simple social order), then the presence of these illegals is itself undesirable. 

The problem is that since they’re here, and they’re committing violence, they’re not likely to simply leave because we ask them to, which is why all necessary force must be used to compel them to leave.  Like chemotherapy which destroys cancer, at this point we need to consider radical action that will deal with the problem of riotous, mayhem-causing illegal aliens.  Simply put, it’s time to give them a taste of the truncheon and the water cannon, and to round them up for a one-way bus ride to the Mexican border.  If Mexico refuses to take them, then they can sit there at the border station till eternity comes, but they’re not coming back in.

In the interest of “rectifying the names,” let’s call the illegal immigration “problem” what it really is—an invasion.  It’s an invasion by hostile foreigners who intrude themselves illegally into our nation, spit on our sovereignty, cause crime, mayhem, and economic dislocation, and then expect to be tolerated and even applauded.  No tolerance for them.  They do not deserve it.  We do not owe it to them.  History is replete with examples of what happens when violent foreigners are allowed to remain within a civilized nation’s borders.  The Goths caused great damage to the Roman Empire.  The Danes did much mischief to England.  The Manchus retarded Chinese progress by centuries.

The choice is clear

Trump, now having secured enough delegates for a first ballot win, and has ever-increasing momentum in his up-and-coming contest with Hillary Clinton, specifically because he is the one candidate out of all of them who actually takes seriously the average American citizen’s concerns about illegal immigration.  It’s sad that out of 17 starting Republican contenders, only Trump came out strongly against the globalism and open borderism that a majority of Americans have now come to reject.  His victory is a testimony to the impression that issue has made on the average American’s psyche.  This, in turn, is because people, even if subconsciously, recognize what I said above—illegal immigration as we are seeing it today is an invasion, not just an economic phenomenon.  It has grave social, cultural, and demographic ramifications that the majority of Americans don’t want to see applied to this nation.  Events like we just saw in Albuquerque hammer these facts home.  If the sort of thing we saw is what will happen if America becomes Mexicanized, then we don’t want America to become Mexicanized.  If we wanted to live in Mexico, we’d move there and deal with all of the (much more) onerous laws they have which apply to foreigners living in their country.

The choice is clear—allow the radical Left to continue to have access to millions of anti-American street thugs who can be used for Nazi-like street violence and campaigns of coercion with the design of overthrowing our consensual, orderly political system, or bite the bullet and do the things necessary to send those people home and keep them out.  What’s it going to be, America?

Tim Dunkin is a pharmaceutical chemist by day, and a freelance author by night, writing about a wide range of topics on religion and politics. He is the author of an online book about Islam entitled Ten Myths About Islam. He is a born-again Christian, and a member of a local, New Testament Baptist church in North Carolina. Follow him on Twitter at @tqcincinnatus and check out his occasional blogging at Meditate in Thy Precepts

All emails may be monitored by the NSA for quality assurance purposes.