WASHINGTON -- As the night follows the day, the VAT cometh.
With the passage of Obamacare, creating a vast new middle-class
entitlement, a national sales tax of the kind near-universal in Europe is
inevitable.
We are now $8 trillion in debt. The Congressional Budget Office projects
that another $12 trillion will be added over the next decade. Obamacare,
when stripped of its budgetary gimmicks -- the unfunded $200 billion-plus
doctor fix, the double counting of Medicare cuts, the 10-6 sleight-of-hand
(counting 10 years of revenue and only 6 years of outflows) -- is at minimum
a $2 trillion new entitlement.
It will vastly increase the debt. But even if it were revenue-neutral,
Obamacare pre-empts and appropriates for itself the best and easiest means
of reducing the existing deficit. Obamacare's $500 billion of cuts
in Medicare and $600 billion in tax hikes are no longer available for
deficit reduction. They are siphoned off for the new entitlement of insuring
the uninsured.
This is fiscally disastrous because, as President Obama himself explained
last year in unveiling his grand transformational policies, our
unsustainable fiscal path requires control of entitlement spending, the most
ruinous of which is out-of-control health care costs.
Obamacare was sold on the premise that, as Nancy Pelosi put it, "health
care reform is entitlement reform. Our budget cannot take this upward spiral
of cost." But the bill enacted on Tuesday accelerates the spiral: It
radically expands Medicaid (adding 15 million new recipients/dependents) and
shamelessly raids Medicare by spending on a new entitlement the $500 billion
in cuts and the yield from the Medicare tax hikes.
Obama knows that the debt bomb is looming, that Moody's is warning that
the Treasury's AAA rating is in jeopardy, that we are headed for a run on
the dollar and/or hyperinflation if nothing is done.
Hence his deficit reduction commission. It will report (surprise!) after
the November elections.
What will it recommend? What can it recommend? Sure, Social
Security can be trimmed by raising the retirement age, introducing means
testing and changing the indexing formula from wage growth to price
inflation.
But this won't be nearly enough. As Obama has repeatedly insisted, the
real money is in health care costs -- which are now locked in place by the
new Obamacare mandates.
That's where the value-added tax comes in. For the politician, it has the
virtue of expediency: People are used to sales taxes, and this one produces
a river of revenue. Every 1 percent of VAT would yield up to $1 trillion a
decade (depending on what you exclude -- if you exempt food, for example,
the yield would be more like $900 billion).
It's the ultimate cash cow. Obama will need it. By introducing universal
health care, he has pulled off the largest expansion of the welfare state in
four decades. And the most expensive. Which is why all of the European Union
has the VAT. Huge VATs. Germany: 19 percent. France and Italy: 20 percent.
Most of Scandinavia: 25 percent.
American liberals have long complained that ours is the only advanced
industrial country without universal health care. Well, now we shall have
it. And as we approach European levels of entitlements, we will need
European levels of taxation.
Obama set out to be a consequential president, on the order of Ronald
Reagan. With the VAT, Obama's triumph will be complete. He will have
succeeded in reversing Reaganism. Liberals have long complained that
Reagan's strategy was to starve the (governmental) beast in order to shrink
it: First, cut taxes -- then ultimately you have to reduce government
spending.
Obama's strategy is exactly the opposite: Expand the beast, and then feed
it. Spend first -- which then forces taxation. Now that, with the
institution of universal health care, we are becoming the full entitlement
state, the beast will have to be fed.
And the VAT is the only trough in creation large enough.
As a substitute for the income tax, the VAT would be a splendid idea.
Taxing consumption makes infinitely more sense than taxing work. But to feed
the liberal social-democratic project, the VAT must be added on top of
the income tax.
Ultimately, even that won't be enough. As the population ages and health
care becomes increasingly expensive, the only way to avoid fiscal ruin (as
Britain, for example, has discovered) is health care rationing.
It will take a while to break the American populace to that idea. In the
meantime, get ready for the VAT. Or start fighting it.