President Obama's appointment of Rashad Hussain, his deputy associate counsel,
as special envoy to the Organization of the Islamic Conference -- the second
largest intergovernmental organization after the United Nations, charged with
safeguarding and protecting "the interests of the Muslim world" -- should be
of serious concern to Congress and the American public.
Especially because
Hussain, a devout Muslim, has a history of participating in events connected
with the Muslim Brotherhood, according to the Chicago Tribune, "the world's
most influential Islamic fundamentalist group" whose goal is to create Muslim
states throughout the world.
In 1991, a memo written by Mohamed Akram for the Shura Council of the
Muslim Brotherhood spelled out the objective of the organization. Akram said
the Muslim Brotherhood "must understand that their work in America is a kind
of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from
within and 'sabotaging' its miserable house by their hands and the hands of
the believers so that it is eliminated and God's religion is made victorious
over all other religions."
I am unable to find any "revelation" that has repealed that objective.
Quite the contrary. Terrorists seem on track for implementing it.
The president proudly announced that Hussain is a Hafiz, someone who has
completely memorized the Quran, but he did not spell out what qualifies
Hussain to meet with foreign leaders at a diplomatic level in a role that
approximates that of an ambassador. According to Jihad Watch, a blog directed
by American author Robert Spencer that "aims to bring to public attention the
role of jihad theology and ideology in the modern world," Hussain's ties to
the Muslim Brotherhood date back to his days at Yale Law School.
Ask yourself: If you or your group were interested in damaging or
destroying the United States, wouldn't infiltration at every possible level of
government and culture be an effective strategy? You would build your schools
and mosques, some of which teach and preach Jihad; you would penetrate the
government; you would demand special rights because of your religion -- such
as no body scanners for Muslim travelers at airports and prayer rooms and foot
washing facilities at shopping malls; you would seek to change the foreign
policy of the United States because you hate Israel and all Jews (and those
"cross-worshipping" Christians) and you would dare the U.S. government to
monitor your speeches and associations because you want to keep America's
guard lower than it would be for, say, a spy from communist China.
This was roughly the plot of the creepy movie "The Manchurian Candidate."
But, unlike the film, this plot is real.
Is there anyone in the dark about those "views and concerns"? Haven't they
been pretty obvious for the last, oh, 40 years? Don't they regularly tell us
in their newspaper editorials, TV commentaries, sermons and actions?
In an age of terrorism when the president's own chief counterterrorism
adviser, John Brennan, compares released terrorists who return to Jihad to
released American criminals who return to crime, it is unsettling to see
someone with Hussain's background representing the United States to nations
that may harbor or fund terrorists and want to destroy Israel and America.
It is unfortunate that the U.S. Senate is not required to confirm special
envoys. Hussain should be asked about his ideology and associations. If he is
to represent America, he should represent what America stands for and not a
personal ideological or religious agenda that is not just un-American, but
anti-American.
Examiner Columnist Cal Thomas is nationally syndicated by Tribune Media.